This Time I Mean It

Getting Past What Holds You Back with Baby Boomer Weight Loss Expert Scott 'Q' Marcus

  • Home
  • Change Habits
    • 21 Day Habit Change.com
  • Blog
    • Newspaper Column
    • Motivational Monday
  • Work With Scott
    • Meet Scott
    • Scott’s Powerful Fun Style
    • For Meeting Planners
    • Speaking Topics
    • What Conference Attendees Say
    • Book Scott to Speak
  • Shop
  • Meet Scott
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
    • Sign up for the FREE ezine
You are here: Home / Diet / Potato Wars: How Long can Schools Serve the Lowly Spud?

Potato Wars: How Long can Schools Serve the Lowly Spud?

October 20, 2011 by Scott "Q" Marcus Leave a Comment

Let us dispel the belief that we have a “do-nothing congress.”

Our Senate recently stood shoulder-to-shoulder in solidarity with the lowly white spud, rebuffing an effort by anti-potato Obama to limit its consumption by schoolchildren. Before you get the inaccurate image of the president and his cabinet slapping french fries from the hands of kindergarteners, you need to know some details.

The administration had proposed limiting the amount of potatoes and other starchy vegetables that can be served in school lunches to one cup per student per week. Beyond that, they wanted to ban them from school breakfasts entirely.

Imagining the horror of a world where breakfasts are without the crunchy, fatty texture of hash browns; and quicker than a fast food chain can deep fry a basket of sliced spuds, the Senate blocked the proposal by adopting an amendment to the 2012 spending bill for the Agriculture Department. The amendment, approved by unanimous consent I might add, prohibited the USDA from establishing “any maximum limits on the serving of vegetables in school meal programs.” Paraphrasing the quotation usually attributed to Voltaire, “I disagree with your choice of Russets but I shall defend to the death your right to eat them.”

In this age of hyper-partisan non-stop bickering and political tantrum throwing, it’s comforting to know that members of our legislature could reach across the aisle for the common good. (It would be nice if it benefited our economy but one must take the victories he gets. Sigh…) Senators Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, and Mark Udall, Democrat of Colorado, set aside partisan differences and defended the starchy spud — coincidentally grown in great quantities in their states — saying that the proposal had no basis in nutrition science. (Not that that has always made a difference in how laws have been crafted previously.)

Said Ms. Collins, “The proposed rule would prevent schools from serving an ear of fresh corn one day and a baked potato another day of the same week, an utterly absurd result.”

Why was the potato singled out, you might ask?

Well, that’s because, unlike celery or green beans, potatoes are defined by the Agriculture Department, as “starchy vegetables.” In addition to white potatoes, this category includes the aforementioned corn, as well as green peas and lima beans. (I thought edamame fell within this classification but it turns out it’s a legume. Besides, there doesn’t seem to be a lot of excitement for a dish of green soybeans boiled or steamed in their pods.) The department’s intent in limiting consumption of starchy vegetables was to “encourage students to try new vegetables…” Personally, I believe the bill targeted the potato because I cannot imagine elementary school children queuing up for an extra helping of lima beans. However, I could be wrong; after all, I enjoy edamame.

Ms. Collins, who started as a small fry amid the potato fields of Maine, (insert rim shot here…) pointed out: “Potatoes have more potassium than bananas. They are cholesterol-free and low in fat and sodium and can be served in countless healthy ways.”

Mr. Udall said, “Anything can be fried or drowned in any number of fats…”

The problem, he rightly pointed out, is not with the potato, but with how it is sometimes prepared. This is true, no doubt. And I am in firm agreement with the goal of improving the nutritional content of our youth. Also, in the interest of full disclosure, I have been known to accept payment in the form of french fries. Having said that, it’s unlikely you’ll find the next junk food crazes to be either broccoli chips, or mashed celery slathered in sour cream and butter.

Related

Filed Under: Diet, Health, Newspaper Column, Weight Loss Tagged With: agriculture department, department of agriculture usda, french fries, hash browns, mark udall, nutrition science, russets, school lunches, schoolchildren, spuds, starchy vegetables, susan collins

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search the Site

Search Products

Blog Categories

Recent Posts

  • Bathroom Humor
  • Scared of my Shadow
  • You are not who you think you were
  • Who are you? Are you sure?
  • Exasperating – the verb

Book An Appointment With Scott

Get a free coaching call by following this link. No obligation.

Contact Us Today

Scott "Q" Marcus
707 834.4090
scottq@thistimeimeanit.com
======
Join Scott's mailing list at http://eepurl.com/LsSIX

Product Categories

  • Accessories
  • Books
  • Coaching Programs
  • DVDs and CDs
  • Instant Downloads
  • Kindle Books
  • Seminars
  • Shirts
  • Site Advertising
  • subscription
  • Uncategorized

Book An Appointment

Recent Posts

  • Bathroom Humor
  • Scared of my Shadow
  • You are not who you think you were
  • Who are you? Are you sure?
  • Exasperating – the verb

This Time I Mean It Copyright © 2025 · All rights reserved · Log in